It Only Makes Sense to Buy a Home in NYC After 18 Years, Longer Than Anywhere in the U.S.

Posted On Tue, January 19, 2016 By

Posted On Tue, January 19, 2016 By In infographic, maps, real estate trends

Renting in New York can get exhausting–the dreaded lease renewal letters, the constant moves, the thought of shelling out tens of thousands of dollars each year to pay someone else’s mortgage. But is it really worth it to buy a home in NYC? According to data from personal finance site SmartAsset, it’s only a good decision after you’ve lived in New York for 18.2 years, longer than anywhere else in the nation by far (h/t Business Insider).

The study looked at 29 major cities across the U.S. and calculated their breakeven point–”the point at which the total costs of renting become greater than the total costs of buying.” As a baseline, they used a household earning $100,000 annually with a 4.5 percent mortgage rate, a 20 percent down payment, and $2,000 in closings costs.

SmartAsset-Home Buyers Chart

Coming in after New York as the worst places to buy are the West Coast tech hubs–San Jose (16.7 years), Seattle (14.9 years), and San Francisco (14.6 years). Philadelphia and Detroit are the best cities to buy, thanks largely to the fact that their populations have decreased over the past 50 years (by 25 percent in Philly and 50 percent in Detroit) and therefore housing stock is much higher than is demand. According to SmartAsset, “a resident of either of these cities should only stay in a rental if she might be moving in the next 3 years.” To see the full explanation and methodology, visit the site HERE >>

[Via Business Insider]


Tags : ,



Thank you, your sign-up request was successful!
This email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.