Health and high-rise living: Is higher healthier?

Posted On Tue, January 24, 2017 By

Posted On Tue, January 24, 2017 By In Features, real estate trends

In 2017, new high-rise developments will continue to define the city’s skyline. There are currently more than 30 high-rise developments under construction and proposed for the waterfront in Queens. In Manhattan, rezoning initiatives promise to bring more high-rise developments to neighborhoods from East Harlem, Two Bridges and Midtown East. And in Downtown Brooklyn, with the 2016 approval of the borough’s tallest tower and a slew of other skyscrapers wrapping construction, the height trend is also well underway. If high-rise developments are on the rise citywide, it is not a surprise. By building up, the City of New York is able to maximize available space and even diversify certain neighborhoods by creating mixed-income housing communities. At their best, high-rise developments can drive economic and social change, but are these buildings also good for our health?

Long before the arrival of today’s supertalls, New Yorkers were already concerned about the potential dangers of high-rise living and not without legitimate cause. When the city’s first skyscrapers appeared in the late nineteenth century, poor air circulation and lack of light posed considerable health risks to high-rise dwellers. Although modern technologies and advanced building designs have improved life above the sixth floor over the past century, the relative benefits and risks of high-rise living and its impact on one’s life expectancy continue to be debated by researchers around the world.


The Risks of High-Rise Living

To be clear, there are no inherent risks associated with living in a high-rise building, but there is a large body of research suggesting that under some circumstances some demographics do report higher mortality rates living on higher versus lower floors. A survey of recent studies reveals that the risks can run the gamut from slower emergency response times to social isolation and depression.

In one widely cited study published in early 2016 in the “Canadian Medical Association Journal,” high-rise living was seen to radically decrease one’s chances of surviving a cardiac arrest. The study, which involved 7,842 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, concluded that survival was greater on lower floors than higher floors. Indeed, the study found that survival was 0.9 percent above floor sixteen and that there were no survivors above the twenty-fifth floor. The study concluded that lower response times were likely to blame for the decreased survival rates of residents living on higher floors. Unfortunately, this is not where the doom and gloom of high-rise living begins and ends.

In addition to being at higher risk due to the fact that first responders may end up stuck on the ground floor waiting for an elevator, living on a higher floor has been linked to many other health problems. Several recent studies, for example, suggest that during the breakout of a highly infectious disease, such as SARS, high-rise dwellers on all floors are at higher risk than people living in single or detached homes. The news is even worse when you consider mental health issues.

Australian architect Kerry Clare recently warned that high-rise living is harming Australia’s “urban fabric” by isolating people from street life. According to Clare, more people living in high-rise buildings means more people living in social and economic silos where the chance encounters of street life are severely compromised. In many respects, Clare’s position resonates with the thinking of New York’s own Jane Jacobs. In her 1961 classic, “The Death and Life of Great American Cities,” Jacobs condemned high-rise living, especially when used as a low-income housing solution. “The corridors of the usual high-rise, low-income housing building are like corridors in a bad dream…creepily lit, narrow, smelly, blind.” Jacobs further lamented, “They feel like traps and they are. So are the elevators that lead to them.”

The social isolation that Clare and Jacobs both associated with high-rise living is often linked to depression and other mental health problems.

432 Park Avenue, views from 432 Park, tallest residential building, NYC starchitectureView from 432 Park Avenue. Image courtesy of 432 Park

The Benefits of High-Rise Living

Despite the grim conclusions about high-rise living cited above, a growing number of studies suggest that living higher rather than lower may in fact increase rather than decrease mortality rates.

A 2013 study published in the “European Journal of Epidemiology” found that among 1.5 million people living in buildings with four or more floors, mortality from all causes was higher for people living on the ground floor compared to those living on higher floors. Indeed, the study found that mortality from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases declined considerably the higher one’s floor of residence.

Although there is no one factor that appears to account for residents’ health on higher floors, several studies suggest that a key factor driving high-rise dwellers’ health is air quality. After all, residents living on lower floors are frequently exposed to high levels of exhaust from parking garages and street-level traffic. In contrast, residents on higher-level floors typically enjoy cleaner air. When high-rises are set back from the street and surrounded by open green spaces, the benefits are even greater.

Nevertheless, the air quality argument may not entirely explain the health of high-rise dwellers. At least some researchers have concluded that if higher is healthier, it may have more to do with socio-economic than environmental factors. After all, in many European and North American cities, living on a higher floor, especially at the penthouse level, is more prestigious and for this reason, the higher the floor, the more likely one is to have money and access to high-quality healthcare, too.

Inside and atop 550 Vanderbilt

Making High-Rise Living Healthier

Design innovations from green roofs to the “breathable” buildings associated with the Passive House movement continue to transform life in the sky and moving forward, we can expect to see more healthy high-rise options come to the market. In short, the dark and dank high-rises that Jane Jacobs once denounced are being replaced by structures defined by fresh air and light.

If you’re thinking about moving into one of the city’s many new high-rise developments, there are a few things to keep in mind. First, look for a smoke-free building. Of course, if you’re living in public housing, as of December 1, 2016, your building has already become smoke-free. Second, consider your needs. If you’re young and healthy, do you need an elevator? Walk-ups are not only more affordable for renters and owners but over time, living in a walk-up can carry significant health benefits. Finally, consider the age of the building and carefully assess the building’s maintenance history—ensure the building has a clear record of health and safety and a dedicated management team.


Tags : , ,

  • StanChaz

    In certain geologic areas (for example, large aeas of PA), especially in older buildings, ground floor residents may be exposed to natural radon gas seaping up from the ground – leading in some cases to lung cancer etc.; Susceptible buildings should be tested (inexpensive kits are available).
    As for the super-rich ensconced in their super-tall castle towers – all the better for them to more safely urinate on the rest of us from their golden penthouses, while spewing their fake “trickle-down economics” mantras, as they laugh all the way to the bank.
    If social inequality continues to increase and widen, I fear there will come a time when these super-tall skyscraper residences will become the abandoned & grotesque tombstones of a failed society…..



Thank you, your sign-up request was successful!
This email address is already subscribed, thank you!
Please provide a valid email address.
Please complete the CAPTCHA.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.